Expanded view ; Early-Stage TRL 1–3

Conceptual development, feasibility assessments, and foundational research typically require:

• Concept notes and research outlines – initial scope, baseline hypotheses, and problem definition.
• Preliminary feasibility studies – early analyses supporting technical potential.
• Supporting literature reviews – peer-reviewed research, white papers, or patents cited as a foundation.
• Initial experimental data – indicative lab findings, basic proof-of-principle results.
• Optional R&D funding approvals – small-scale grants, institutional seed funding evidence.

Platform metrics indicate early-stage TRL 1–3 submissions typically include ~12 PDFs, 4 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 18 minutes.

Mid-Stage TRL Validation (TRL 4–5)

Prototype development and validation stages expected by regulators, institutional reviewers, or funding authorities include:

• Proof-of-concept validation – controlled lab test reports confirming feasibility.
• Prototype engineering documentation – schematics, Bills of Materials, build records.
• Simulation and experimental data – computational models, validation reports, raw outputs.
• Risk and compliance assessments – hazard analyses, conformity with safety standards.
• Independent expert assessment – validation reports or assessor opinions.
• Optional funding evidence – milestone reports for mid-stage grants.

VerifiedClimate™ platform metrics indicate mid-stage TRL 4–5 submissions typically include ~11 PDFs, 3 Word documents, 1 Excel sheet, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 16 minutes.

Pilot-Scale Demonstrations (TRL 6–7)

Field testing, Series A funding readiness, and regulatory alignment at pilot scale typically include:

• Field trial documentation – monitored conditions, test performance reports.
• Extended compliance assessments – certifications, CE marking, hazard reports.
• Third-party evaluations – independent test or validation reports.
• Commercial feasibility studies – market readiness analysis, adoption forecasts.
• Partnership confirmations – letters of support from regulators or industrial partners.
• Gap analysis for TRL 8–9 – remaining steps to market deployment.

Platform metrics indicate TRL 6–7 submissions typically include ~16 PDFs, 5 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 2 supporting images, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 22 minutes.(TRL 8–9 market readiness is referenced in broader governance and regulatory filings.)

Funding authorities such as Horizon Europe, Innovate UK, and U.S. DOE programmes typically expect:

• Official funding call reference – published programme identifier.
• Completed application form in required format – strictly as specified by the funding body. (Formal submission must still follow the funding authority’s channels; many organizations maintain a VerifiedClimate™ record in parallel for timestamped archival.)
• Detailed technical and impact narrative – project objectives, outcomes, alignment with programme goals.
• Structured work plan – milestones, deliverables, resource allocation.
• Budget and cost justification – eligible and co-funded costs aligned with EU or national rules.
• Organizational capacity records – staff CVs, prior experience, institutional endorsements.
• Partnership confirmations – letters of intent, consortium agreements.
• Risk management plans – registers, mitigation measures, ethical considerations.
• Regulatory and ethical approvals – environmental permits, ethics board clearance.
• Optional SME or certification proof – SME status declarations, ISO accreditations.

Platform metrics indicate typical grant submission packages include ~24 PDFs, 5 Word documents, 3 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 28 minutes.

Disclosures aligned with CSRD, IFRS S2, or Paris Agreement frameworks typically include:

• Consolidated ESG or sustainability report – structured to CSRD or IFRS S2 guidance.
• Underlying emissions inventories – Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions (ISO 14064-compliant).
• Supply chain due diligence – supplier codes of conduct, ESG audits, compliance declarations.
• Board-approved sustainability policies – climate transition plans, Paris Agreement alignment.
• Third-party assurance reports – limited or reasonable assurance from accredited auditors.
• Methodology statements – KPI calculation methods, materiality matrices.
• Climate risk and opportunity assessments – TCFD-aligned scenario planning.
• Year-on-year comparative ESG data – historical performance datasets.
• EU Taxonomy disclosures – alignment of turnover, CapEx, and OpEx.
• Optional investor briefing materials – ESG decks, stakeholder updates.

Platform metrics indicate ESG reporting packages typically include ~24 PDFs, 5 Word documents, 3 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 28 minutes.

Board submissions, investor disclosures, and stakeholder filings typically include:

• Formal board or committee papers – resolutions, decision briefs, agenda packs.
• Risk registers and analysis – financial, operational, or environmental risks.
• Stakeholder assurance briefings – investor, shareholder, or consortium documents.
• Minutes or records of prior meetings – governance context.
• Annexed technical or financial schedules – supplementary decision-making evidence.
• Material event disclosures – updates on major governance matters.
• Updated governance policies – codes of conduct, conflict-of-interest registers.
• External assurance reports – governance audits by PwC, Deloitte, or similar.
• Legal or regulatory opinions – external counsel reviews.
• Optional oversight letters – confirmations from funders or regulators.

Platform metrics indicate governance filings typically include ~10 PDFs, 3 Word documents, and 1 Excel sheet, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 20 minutes.

Offset project developers and organizations disclosing emissions reductions under the Paris Agreement, ISO 14064, or voluntary carbon standards typically include:

• Baseline emissions inventories – Scope 1, 2, 3 data.
• Project design documentation – methodologies, boundaries, leakage assessments.
• Monitoring and verification reports – accredited auditor findings.
• Carbon credit issuance documentation – registry certificates, serialization records.
• Stakeholder consultation records – meeting notes, public comments.
• Environmental impact assessments – biodiversity, water, land-use impacts.
• Conformity statements – CDM, VCS, or Gold Standard certifications.
• Buyer or investor contracts – agreements relating to credit sales or claims.
• Paris Agreement alignment statements – national or corporate target alignment.
• Optional public disclosures – press releases, sustainability web content.

Platform metrics indicate carbon claim submissions typically include ~19 PDFs, 3 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 3 supporting images, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 26 minutes.

Public tenders and institutional procurement processes typically require:

• Official tender documentation – published tender notice, scope of work.
• Mandatory compliance certificates – ISO accreditations, tax clearances, insurances.
• Technical proposals – design specifications, implementation methodologies.
• Financial proposals – itemized pricing schedules, bid validity letters.
• Proof of organizational capacity – prior experience records, technical staff CVs.
• Supply chain due diligence – declarations of origin, ESG compliance documentation.
• Client references – endorsements from previous contracting authorities.
• Risk mitigation strategies – health & safety, environmental risk protocols.
• Signed declarations – anti-corruption, conflict-of-interest disclosures.
• Optional consortium agreements – partner or subcontractor confirmations.

Platform metrics indicate procurement submissions typically include ~12 PDFs, 4 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 18 minutes.

Research outputs submitted for academic publication, funding reviews, or institutional archiving typically include:

• Draft or published manuscript – preprints or journal-ready articles.
• Underlying datasets – raw and processed research data.
• Statistical or computational methodologies – analysis workflows, code repositories.
• Ethical approval documentation – IRB approvals, research clearance.
• Literature review archives – key references, prior evidence.
• Peer review correspondence – reviewer feedback, responses.
• Conflict of interest disclosures – required statements for journal or funder compliance.
• Grant funding acknowledgments – evidence of financial support.
• Licensing and open-access agreements – publication rights confirmations.
• Optional supplementary materials – high-resolution figures, multimedia.

Platform metrics indicate academic research submissions typically include ~10 PDFs, 3 Word documents, and 1 Excel sheet, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 20 minutes.

Certification bodies (ISO, FSC, LEED) and accreditation authorities typically expect:

• Certification application forms – strictly in the authority’s required format.
• Quality manuals and policies – documented management systems.
• Standard operating procedures (SOPs) – process-level documentation.
• Evidence of implementation – operational logs, training registers.
• Internal audit reports – pre-certification self-assessments.
• Corrective action plans – responses to identified gaps.
• Legal or regulatory permits – licenses required for accreditation.
• Third-party evaluation reports – external auditor findings.
• Historical certifications – records of prior accreditations.
• Optional global alignment references – UN SDGs, Paris Agreement targets.

Platform metrics indicate certification submissions typically include ~12 PDFs, 4 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 18 minutes.

Formal collaboration agreements and governance records generally include:

• Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) – outlining high-level intent.
• Consortium agreements – legal collaboration terms.
• Governance frameworks – decision-making structures, escalation mechanisms.
• Financial commitments – cost-sharing arrangements.
• Risk allocation statements – liability, indemnity, insurance clauses.
• IP agreements – ownership and licensing of background/foreground IP.
• Work package definitions – partner-specific deliverables.
• Third-party endorsements – letters of support from regulators or investors.
• Contingency and withdrawal protocols – conflict resolution clauses.
• Optional communications agreements – joint branding policies.

Platform metrics indicate partnership submissions typically include ~10 PDFs, 3 Word documents, and 1 Excel sheet, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 20 minutes.

Broader compliance filings, statutory disclosures, and regulatory submissions typically require:

• Regulatory forms and templates – prescribed by oversight bodies.
• Audited financial statements – statutory accounts, tax filings.
• Operational compliance reports – health & safety, environmental, or quality.
• Data privacy documentation – GDPR/CCPA registers, DPIAs.
• Stakeholder consultation records – public engagement summaries.
• Independent legal opinions – external counsel reviews.
• Official correspondence – communications with regulators.
• Permit renewals and licenses – documentation of authorizations.
• Assurance or attestation reports – third-party compliance verification.
• Optional voluntary disclosures – adherence to industry pledges.

Platform metrics indicate regulatory filings typically include ~12 PDFs, 4 Word documents, 2 Excel sheets, and 1 supporting image, with an average submission time on this infrastructure of 18 minutes.